{"id":14203,"date":"2022-08-09T12:58:48","date_gmt":"2022-08-09T16:58:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/?p=14203"},"modified":"2025-09-05T13:28:51","modified_gmt":"2025-09-05T19:28:51","slug":"how-good-are-finance-pros-at-detecting-deception","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/2022\/08\/09\/how-good-are-finance-pros-at-detecting-deception\/","title":{"rendered":"How Good are Finance Pros at Detecting Deception?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[et_pb_section fb_built=&#8221;1&#8243; admin_label=&#8221;section&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; theme_builder_area=&#8221;post_content&#8221;][et_pb_row admin_label=&#8221;row&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; background_size=&#8221;initial&#8221; background_position=&#8221;top_left&#8221; background_repeat=&#8221;repeat&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; theme_builder_area=&#8221;post_content&#8221;][et_pb_column type=&#8221;4_4&#8243; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; custom_padding=&#8221;|||&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; custom_padding__hover=&#8221;|||&#8221; theme_builder_area=&#8221;post_content&#8221;][et_pb_text admin_label=&#8221;Text&#8221; _builder_version=&#8221;4.16&#8243; background_size=&#8221;initial&#8221; background_position=&#8221;top_left&#8221; background_repeat=&#8221;repeat&#8221; global_colors_info=&#8221;{}&#8221; theme_builder_area=&#8221;post_content&#8221;]<\/p>\n<figure class=\"x-el x-el-figure c2-1 c2-2 c2-3x c2-i c2-h c2-21 c2-2c c2-29 c2-2a c2-5i c2-4v c2-3 c2-4 c2-5 c2-6 c2-7 c2-8\">\n<div><\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Last week in our article entitled, \u201cFinancial Professionals\u2019 Beliefs about Deception,\u201d we reviewed our scientific paper, \u201cDetecting Lies in the Financial Industry \u2013 A Survey of Investment Professionals\u2019 Beliefs,\u201d published in the\u00a0<em class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-31 c2-63 c2-64\">Journal of Behavioral Finance.<\/em>\u00a0This week we review another of our scientific papers published in that journal, \u201cInvestment Professionals&#8217; Ability to Detect Deception: Accuracy, Bias and Metacognitive Realism.\u201d<a class=\"x-el x-el-a c2-2w c2-2x c2-66 c2-v c2-w c2-x c2-j c2-67 c2-3 c2-30 c2-31 c2-11 c2-32\" href=\"https:\/\/blogging.godaddy.com\/blog\/a6d795a4-a672-4120-a6ba-07384a52a2d8\/posts\/09e875dc-7ddf-4099-889f-3e657c0df485#_edn1\" rel=\"\">[i]<\/a>\u00a0Our research, conducted along with deception scientists, was history\u2019s first that explored how good finance pros are at detecting deception. Here is a summary of that work.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">General Public\u2019s Ability to Detect Deception<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Before discussing finance pros\u2019 ability to detect deception it is helpful to consider the success rate of people, in general. As discussed in some of our previous articles,\u00a0<a class=\"x-el x-el-a c2-2w c2-2x c2-66 c2-v c2-w c2-x c2-j c2-67 c2-3 c2-30 c2-31 c2-11 c2-32\" href=\"https:\/\/deceptionandtruthanalysis.com\/insights\/f\/deception-detection-the-pan-cultural-fiction-of-body-language\" rel=\"\">the global success rate for deception detection as measured in two separate meta-analyses is just around 54%<\/a>. This is true whether someone is a lay person or a professional, such as someone working in law enforcement or psychology. In other words, people are just slightly better than chance at detecting deception.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Crucially, most people when attempting to detect deception rely on pan-cultural fictions about how to do it. Namely, they tend to rely on body language cues or vocal cues. Most of these beliefs about how to detect deception have been soundly debunked.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">Overview of the Deception Science Work<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Our scientific research was done with the cooperation of 215 financial professionals whose demographics were as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Gender: 91% men<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Age range: 24 to 68 years, mean of 39.03 years<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Years of experience: 0-10 years: 37.8% \/\/ 11-20 years: 43.0% \/\/ 20+ years: 19.2%<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">These demographics indicated that the sample was representative of the profession\u2019s typical makeup. Participants were then asked to evaluate various kinds of stimulus materials, including video recordings ranging from those participating in an experimental setup, to convicted felons, and to real-life high stakes lies. Audio recordings of known fraudulent earnings calls were used as the stimulus materials for measuring finance pro\u2019s ability to discern deception within the field.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">Investment Pros\u2019 Ability to Detect Deception<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Accuracy for deception in a personal life setting was 50.2%, or essentially 50:50 chance. While, accuracy in evaluating deception in a financial setting was 51.8%. Again, this result was fairly close to the odds of guessing. But what about finance pros\u2019 ability to discriminate between truthful statements and deceptive statements?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Overall accuracy for evaluating truthfulness was 49.7%, and for deception it was 51.6%. Disturbingly, within finance when the pros\u2019 assessed a statement as true they were 60.7% accurate, but just 38.2% accurate when they assessed a statement as deceptive. Finance pros also showed a statistically significant and equally disturbing truth bias of 60.6%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">We also evaluated the level of accuracy against the self-reported confidence in judgments of finance pros. Regardless of the confidence expressed by finance pros in their deception detection abilities their accuracy remained very stable. The one exception was for those finance pros who reported a confidence in their judgments of &gt;90% where overall accuracy was a paltry 29.8%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Age was unrelated to deception detection accuracy, as was years of experience. Pros with the least experience were 43.8% accurate; those with 10-20 years of experience were 51% accurate; and those with 20+ years of experience were 51.6% accurate. These differences were not statistically significant.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><\/span><\/p>\n<h3><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">Conclusion<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">In conclusion, finance pros are slightly worse than the general population at deception detection. This is true whether they are assessing deception in their personal lives or in their professional lives. There were no demographic distinctions that were significant. Finance pros showed several disturbing things:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">1. Their ability to discern deception was just 38.2%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">2. They showed a strong truth bias of 60.6%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">3. For those most confident in their deception detection abilities, their actual ability was just 29.8%.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a class=\"x-el x-el-a c2-2w c2-2x c2-66 c2-v c2-w c2-x c2-j c2-67 c2-3 c2-30 c2-31 c2-11 c2-32\" href=\"https:\/\/blogging.godaddy.com\/blog\/a6d795a4-a672-4120-a6ba-07384a52a2d8\/posts\/09e875dc-7ddf-4099-889f-3e657c0df485#_ednref1\" rel=\"\">[i]<\/a>Hartwig, Maria; Jason A. Voss; Laure Brimbal; &amp; D. Brian Wallace. \u201cInvestment Professionals\u2019 Ability to Detect Deception: Accuracy, Bias and Metacognitive Realism.\u201d\u00a0<em class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-31 c2-63 c2-64\">Journal of Behavioral Finance<\/em>\u00a0(2017): Vol 18, No. 1, pp. 1-13<\/span><\/p>\n<p>[\/et_pb_text][\/et_pb_column][\/et_pb_row][\/et_pb_section]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week in our article entitled, \u201cFinancial Professionals\u2019 Beliefs about Deception,\u201d we reviewed our scientific paper, \u201cDetecting Lies in the Financial Industry \u2013 A Survey of Investment Professionals\u2019 Beliefs,\u201d published in the\u00a0Journal of Behavioral Finance.\u00a0This week we review another of our scientific papers published in that journal, \u201cInvestment Professionals&#8217; Ability to Detect Deception: Accuracy, Bias [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":14204,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"on","_et_pb_old_content":"<figure class=\"x-el x-el-figure c2-1 c2-2 c2-3x c2-i c2-h c2-21 c2-2c c2-29 c2-2a c2-5i c2-4v c2-3 c2-4 c2-5 c2-6 c2-7 c2-8\">\r\n<div>\r\n<div><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><img class=\"x-el x-el-img c2-1 c2-2 c2-k c2-21 c2-1x c2-1y c2-29 c2-2b c2-s c2-68 c2-4f c2-3 c2-4 c2-5 c2-6 c2-7 c2-8\" title=\"How Good are Finance Pros at Detecting Deception?\" src=\"https:\/\/img1.wsimg.com\/isteam\/ip\/b4167b12-c211-4a45-9c4b-489be14138f8\/Lie%20Detector.jpg\/:\/cr=t:0%25,l:0%25,w:100%25,h:100%25\/rs=w:1280\" alt=\"How Good are Finance Pros at Detecting Deception?\" \/><\/span><\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<figcaption class=\"x-el x-el-figcaption c2-1 c2-2 c2-v c2-w c2-3d c2-29 c2-2b c2-49 c2-69 c2-6a c2-6b c2-6c c2-3 c2-6d c2-3e c2-10 c2-3f c2-3g c2-3h c2-3i\"><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">How Good are Finance Pros at Detecting Deception?<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\r\n<em><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">By Jason Apollo Voss, CFA<\/span><\/em>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Last week in our article entitled, \u201cFinancial Professionals\u2019 Beliefs about Deception,\u201d we reviewed our scientific paper, \u201cDetecting Lies in the Financial Industry \u2013 A Survey of Investment Professionals\u2019 Beliefs,\u201d published in the\u00a0<em class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-31 c2-63 c2-64\">Journal of Behavioral Finance.<\/em>\u00a0This week we review another of our scientific papers published in that journal, \u201cInvestment Professionals' Ability to Detect Deception: Accuracy, Bias and Metacognitive Realism.\u201d<a class=\"x-el x-el-a c2-2w c2-2x c2-66 c2-v c2-w c2-x c2-j c2-67 c2-3 c2-30 c2-31 c2-11 c2-32\" href=\"https:\/\/blogging.godaddy.com\/blog\/a6d795a4-a672-4120-a6ba-07384a52a2d8\/posts\/09e875dc-7ddf-4099-889f-3e657c0df485#_edn1\" rel=\"\">[i]<\/a>\u00a0Our research, conducted along with deception scientists, was history\u2019s first that explored how good finance pros are at detecting deception. Here is a summary of that work.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">General Public\u2019s Ability to Detect Deception<\/strong><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Before discussing finance pros\u2019 ability to detect deception it is helpful to consider the success rate of people, in general. As discussed in some of our previous articles,\u00a0<a class=\"x-el x-el-a c2-2w c2-2x c2-66 c2-v c2-w c2-x c2-j c2-67 c2-3 c2-30 c2-31 c2-11 c2-32\" href=\"https:\/\/deceptionandtruthanalysis.com\/insights\/f\/deception-detection-the-pan-cultural-fiction-of-body-language\" rel=\"\">the global success rate for deception detection as measured in two separate meta-analyses is just around 54%<\/a>. This is true whether someone is a lay person or a professional, such as someone working in law enforcement or psychology. In other words, people are just slightly better than chance at detecting deception.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Crucially, most people when attempting to detect deception rely on pan-cultural fictions about how to do it. Namely, they tend to rely on body language cues or vocal cues. Most of these beliefs about how to detect deception have been soundly debunked.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">Overview of the Deception Science Work<\/strong><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Our scientific research was done with the cooperation of 215 financial professionals whose demographics were as follows:<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">* Gender: 91% men<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">* Age range: 24 to 68 years, mean of 39.03 years<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">* Years of experience: 0-10 years: 37.8% \/\/ 11-20 years: 43.0% \/\/ 20+ years: 19.2%<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">These demographics indicated that the sample was representative of the profession\u2019s typical makeup. Participants were then asked to evaluate various kinds of stimulus materials, including video recordings ranging from those participating in an experimental setup, to convicted felons, and to real-life high stakes lies. Audio recordings of known fraudulent earnings calls were used as the stimulus materials for measuring finance pro\u2019s ability to discern deception within the field.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">Investment Pros\u2019 Ability to Detect Deception<\/strong><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Accuracy for deception in a personal life setting was 50.2%, or essentially 50:50 chance. While, accuracy in evaluating deception in a financial setting was 51.8%. Again, this result was fairly close to the odds of guessing. But what about finance pros\u2019 ability to discriminate between truthful statements and deceptive statements?<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Overall accuracy for evaluating truthfulness was 49.7%, and for deception it was 51.6%. Disturbingly, within finance when the pros\u2019 assessed a statement as true they were 60.7% accurate, but just 38.2% accurate when they assessed a statement as deceptive. Finance pros also showed a statistically significant and equally disturbing truth bias of 60.6%.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">We also evaluated the level of accuracy against the self-reported confidence in judgments of finance pros. Regardless of the confidence expressed by finance pros in their deception detection abilities their accuracy remained very stable. The one exception was for those finance pros who reported a confidence in their judgments of &gt;90% where overall accuracy was a paltry 29.8%.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Age was unrelated to deception detection accuracy, as was years of experience. Pros with the least experience were 43.8% accurate; those with 10-20 years of experience were 51% accurate; and those with 20+ years of experience were 51.6% accurate. These differences were not statistically significant.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-3v c2-63\">Conclusion<\/strong><\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">In conclusion, finance pros are slightly worse than the general population at deception detection. This is true whether they are assessing deception in their personal lives or in their professional lives. There were no demographic distinctions that were significant. Finance pros showed several disturbing things:<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">1. Their ability to discern deception was just 38.2%.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">2. They showed a strong truth bias of 60.6%.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">3. For those most confident in their deception detection abilities, their actual ability was just 29.8%.<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\">\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span>\r\n\r\n<span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a class=\"x-el x-el-a c2-2w c2-2x c2-66 c2-v c2-w c2-x c2-j c2-67 c2-3 c2-30 c2-31 c2-11 c2-32\" href=\"https:\/\/blogging.godaddy.com\/blog\/a6d795a4-a672-4120-a6ba-07384a52a2d8\/posts\/09e875dc-7ddf-4099-889f-3e657c0df485#_ednref1\" rel=\"\">[i]<\/a>Hartwig, Maria; Jason A. Voss; Laure Brimbal; &amp; D. Brian Wallace. \u201cInvestment Professionals\u2019 Ability to Detect Deception: Accuracy, Bias and Metacognitive Realism.\u201d\u00a0<em class=\"x-el x-el-span c2-2w c2-2x c2-3 c2-62 c2-13 c2-31 c2-63 c2-64\">Journal of Behavioral Finance<\/em>\u00a0(2017): Vol 18, No. 1, pp. 1-13<\/span>","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3,465],"tags":[444,449,447,445],"class_list":["post-14203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-blog","category-d-a-t-a","tag-body-language","tag-deception-beliefs","tag-deception-science","tag-key-scientific-paper-redux"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14203"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14203\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14204"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}