{"id":4319,"date":"2011-05-31T02:13:37","date_gmt":"2011-05-31T08:13:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonapollovoss.local\/?p=4319"},"modified":"2018-09-21T02:06:12","modified_gmt":"2018-09-21T06:06:12","slug":"awesome-statistic-about-derivatives-slight-return","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/2011\/05\/31\/awesome-statistic-about-derivatives-slight-return\/","title":{"rendered":"Awesome Statistic About Derivatives slight return"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Yesterday I wrote a post entitled, &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web2011\/05\/30\/what-my-intuition-tells-me-now-awesome-statistic-about-derivatives\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Awesome Statistic About Derivatives<\/a>&#8221; and I wanted to post a few additional comments to help create a better context for understanding the information.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">First, in the comments section of the blog I was asked if I could corroborate the data as reported by Mark M\u00f6bius of Templeton where he claimed that the total value (i.e. the notional value) of all over the counter derivatives contracts was ten times larger than worldwide gross domestic product.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The answer was &#8220;yes.&#8221;\u00a0 The Bank for International Settlements reported that the total notional value of OTC derivatives contracts at the end of 2010 was $601 trillion.\u00a0 Meanwhile, the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency World Factbook reported total worldwide 2010 gross domestic product as $61.96 trillion.\u00a0 So M\u00f6bius&#8217; claim was spot on.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">While alarming, the statistic isn&#8217;t quite as alarming as it may sound.\u00a0 Why?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Most importantly, gross domestic product (GDP) is a measure of financial return.\u00a0 In order to generate financial return you need underlying assets.\u00a0 Think about your own bank account.\u00a0 In order to earn interest, you have to have principal.\u00a0 GDP is the equivalent of interest.\u00a0 So how can we figure out total worldwide principal?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">To my knowledge no one has ever attempted to do this before.\u00a0 However, I do know that over time <a href=\"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web2009\/01\/17\/what-is-real-economic-growth\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">real economic growth<\/a> has averaged around 3%.\u00a0 That means that through basic mathematics we can make a guess as to what the total value of assets worldwide is, like this:<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">$61.97 trillion 2010 GDP\/return \u00f7 3.0% = $2,065.7 trillion 2010 total worldwide assets<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Presumably that $601 trillion of derivatives contracts is written with underlying collateral of real assets.\u00a0 If so, then that $601 trillion worth of derivatives contracts represents: $601 trillion \u00f7 $2,065.7 trillion of total worldwide assets = 29.1% of total assets.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Clearly this number is less scary.\u00a0 But I still consider it to be really scary.\u00a0 Why?\u00a0 Because most of the derivatives contracts that are written are not collateralized by real assets, just the credit of the issuer.\u00a0 And it is still true that most derivatives traders never have any intention of taking possession of the underlying assets on their derivatives contracts.\u00a0 No.\u00a0 Instead, they are looking to earn money on variances in price and differences in predictions as to the price direction of the underlying assets.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The word for this is speculation.\u00a0 That speculation is to the tune of 29.1% of the total value of all assets on the planet and represents almost 10 years worth of global economic return.\u00a0\u00a0<strong> And that <em>is<\/em> scary.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Jason<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday I wrote a post entitled, &#8220;Awesome Statistic About Derivatives&#8221; and I wanted to post a few additional comments to help create a better context for understanding the information. First, in the comments section of the blog I was asked if I could corroborate the data as reported by Mark M\u00f6bius of Templeton where he [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4319","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-the-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4319","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4319"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4319\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4319"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4319"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4319"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}