{"id":458,"date":"2010-07-20T11:01:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-20T15:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.intuitiveinvestor.com\/web\/?p=458"},"modified":"2018-08-18T17:38:02","modified_gmt":"2018-08-18T21:38:02","slug":"a-game-of-chicken","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/2010\/07\/20\/a-game-of-chicken\/","title":{"rendered":"A game of chicken"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Much start-stop strangeness is happening in the stock markets.\u00a0 Ostensibly this is due to companies reporting earnings that either exceed or are in line with expectations; yet whose revenues fail to excite.\u00a0 This is the very same issue I wrote about over a year ago as the U.S. economy started to recover.\u00a0 See my post on &#8220;operating leverage&#8221; for the full story.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Companies can frequently find ways of cutting costs in order to milk out extra profit.\u00a0 But the grand daddy\/mommy number is revenues (i.e. sales).\u00a0 Sales are driven by actual customers making actual purchases.\u00a0 As we all know the U.S. consumer is depressed and grumpy.\u00a0 That means that you and I have anxieties and worries and we are not spending much on non-essential items.\u00a0 Hence, revenues are disappointing investors.\u00a0 Consequently, stock market investors are more in a selling than buying mood.\u00a0 Because consumers look to the stock markets as an indicator of economic health, a declining market makes them even more anxious, depressed and grumpy.\u00a0 That, in turn, makes it hard for companies to have confidence that it is time to hire more workers.\u00a0 That, in turn, makes consumers more anxious, more depressed and more grumpy.\u00a0 See where this is headed?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">We are currently in a big ole game of chicken.\u00a0 Who will blink first in the &#8220;I am confident enough to spend&#8221; game?\u00a0 Will consumers get over their fears of job loss and economic ruin and actually start spending money regardless of stock market performance?\u00a0 Or will businesses hire employees despite the fact that they can&#8217;t justify additional workers because of a lack of additional revenues?\u00a0 Can you see the central axis around which this entire episode is revolving?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">FEAR.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Or rather, not real fear, but anxiety.\u00a0 The problem with anxiety is that it leads to such a clenching of the spending sphincter that real problems can eventually unfold.\u00a0 That would then lead to circumstances where <em>real<\/em> fear was warranted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">So what can we do as investors?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">For starters (and unfortunately, I have been saying this for awhile), many great companies are selling very cheaply right now.\u00a0 If you are waiting for conviction that the stock markets are really stable and are not going to drop further from here, I understand.\u00a0 After all, I would like to have back my approximately 7% in losses suffered since my &#8220;buy&#8221; call at the beginning of May.\u00a0 However, if you broaden your horizons beyond the next 6 months and look back 40 years and look forward 10, you will see that great U.S. businesses (including monopolists like Google) are selling very inexpensively relative to historical valuation levels.\u00a0 Not only, but they are selling cheaply relative to their future prospects.\u00a0 Are consumers not using Google because they are worried about&#8230;..EVERYTHING?\u00a0 No.\u00a0 Are consumers going to stop buying toilet paper?\u00a0 I hope not.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">One of my favorite investment models comes from a gentleman named Edgar Peters who once described how market crashes happen.\u00a0 Let me share that with you.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Stock markets typically have investors who are short-term and long-term focused.\u00a0 Generally, short-term investors are much more sensitive to gyrations in news.\u00a0 That is, they will sell based on minor news stories of little true effect.\u00a0 When the short-term investors sell because of the news they need to find a buyer.\u00a0 That is, someone willing to provide them with cash for their shares.\u00a0 Typically the provider of liquidity is the long-term investor.\u00a0 But what happens when the long-term investor is also deeply affected by the news and is unwilling to provide liquidity?\u00a0 A big, big market decline.\u00a0 In other words, market crashes happen when long-term investors become short-term investors.\u00a0 So what does this all mean?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">It means that right now many long-term investors are considering becoming short-term investors.\u00a0 This is why, in my opinion, the stock market has been so volatile (up and down) for the last several months.\u00a0 What can you do?\u00a0 Be a long-term investor.\u00a0 Liquidity rules in big declines.\u00a0 When you execute your buy orders, do so on big market decline days and bid for your shares below the current market price if allowed by your broker.\u00a0 And most importantly, take confidence in that you are buying an interest in an <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">actual business<\/span> and not in a piece of paper.\u00a0 That actual business makes actual products and is run by actual people.\u00a0 That means that you have purchased something real and something that is interested in survival and success no matter what is happening economically.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Separately (I know this is a long post), let me discuss possible policy remedies on the part of politicians&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">1.\u00a0 Keynesian economic theory has been criticized exiting the recession.\u00a0 Mostly because the recovery has not been kick ass despite massive government spending.\u00a0 However, the real heart of Keynesian economic theory is not government spending.\u00a0 It is that the government is assumed to be a more permanent, less volatile, institution than businesses.\u00a0 That is, government stands <strong>outside<\/strong> the realm of the economy.\u00a0 Consequently, government is one of the institutions (another is the military)\u00a0that can step in from outside of the economy to influence the economy.\u00a0 So we should be looking for some political assistance to break up the silly &#8220;game of chicken&#8221; taking place between consumers and businesses right now.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">2.\u00a0 It&#8217;s about the consumer, stupid!\u00a0 The U.S. government ought to be passing legislation to the benefit of the U.S. consumer.\u00a0 To some extent this has been done.\u00a0 There have been: first time home buyer tax credits; cash for clunkers; extensions of unemployment benefits; jobs programs from the U.S. government, etc.\u00a0 However, none of these has led to the unemployment rate being dented.\u00a0 And without jobs, the consumer will remain anxious, depressed and grumpy and the economy will remain mired.\u00a0 So what can the Feds do?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">One suggestion is to waive Social Security and payroll taxes for businesses for 18 months.\u00a0 While potentially very expensive, it will definitely lead to more hiring.\u00a0 With money in her\/his pocket, the consumer&#8217;s confidence will increase and their spending is likely to increase, too.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Another suggestion is to enlarge the Federal government&#8217;s programs spending.\u00a0 Countless roads and bridges around the country have been improved by U.S. government jobs programs over the last two years.\u00a0 Here&#8217;s an idea: hire the unemployed to go to the Gulf of Mexico and help clean up the despicable BP oil spill.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Another suggestion: insist that the long-term unemployed go back to a trade or technical or university school to learn additional job skills.\u00a0 The Feds could agree to pick up half of the cost of the tuition as long as it was job skills related.\u00a0 Or a tax break could be provided to folks.\u00a0 The point though is that something like this has to be mandatory.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">3.\u00a0 It&#8217;s also about the investor, stupid!\u00a0 To turn investors more into long-term investors eliminate the long-term capital gains tax for 3 years.\u00a0 That is, if you hold onto your equity investment longer than a year, then any gain is free.\u00a0 Additionally, though much more dramatic, you could raise the capital gains tax on the short-term investor, say up to 40-50%.\u00a0 People would be outraged.\u00a0 But then again, before they deployed their capital they would be very careful about what they bought and once they did buy they would hold on for awhile.\u00a0 This would dramatically reduce financial market volatility for several years, though it might induce a stomach-churning sell off in the first several days after the law had passed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">The game of chicken is going to be corrected one way or another.\u00a0 One method is just to let market forces play themselves out &#8211; the reactive method.\u00a0 The other method is to do something about it &#8211; the proactive method.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 16px;\">Jason<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Much start-stop strangeness is happening in the stock markets.\u00a0 Ostensibly this is due to companies reporting earnings that either exceed or are in line with expectations; yet whose revenues fail to excite.\u00a0 This is the very same issue I wrote about over a year ago as the U.S. economy started to recover.\u00a0 See my post [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[12,3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-458","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best-of-the-blog","category-the-blog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/458","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=458"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/458\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=458"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=458"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=458"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}