{"id":8782,"date":"2020-12-09T00:01:08","date_gmt":"2020-12-09T05:01:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.jasonapollovoss.local\/?p=8782"},"modified":"2020-12-08T15:15:59","modified_gmt":"2020-12-08T20:15:59","slug":"a-theory-of-behavioral-finance-assumption-4-sociological-factors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/2020\/12\/09\/a-theory-of-behavioral-finance-assumption-4-sociological-factors\/","title":{"rendered":"A Theory of Behavioral Finance \u2013 Assumption 4 \u2013 Sociological Factors"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Over the last several weeks we have been exploring <u><a href=\"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web2020\/11\/10\/a-theory-of-behavioral-finance\/\">A Theory of Behavioral Finance<\/a><\/u>. So, far I have provided <u><a href=\"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web2020\/11\/17\/a-theory-of-behavioral-finance-assumption-1-a-combination-of-factors\/\">a high-level overview of the theory<\/a><\/u>, as well as a discussion of two of the parents of behavioral bias: <u><a href=\"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web2020\/11\/24\/a-theory-of-behavioral-finance-assumption-2-the-biological-factors\/\">biology<\/a><\/u> and <u><a href=\"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web2020\/12\/01\/a-theory-of-behavioral-finance-assumption-3-the-psychological-factors\/\">psychology<\/a><\/u>. In this article I discuss the sociological factors that lead to our errors in judgement.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">For convenience, here are the sociological factors that I outlined previously:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol start=\"4\">\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Sociological factors affecting human behavior include:<\/span>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Safety<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Group feedback that is either positive or negative about attitudes, behaviors, and choices<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural; font-size: 20px;\"><strong>Why Sociology is Important for Understanding Bias<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">It should come as no surprise that most people care about what others think of them. Most people also are concerned with how well they fit in with groups. Why?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">It is easy to imagine a time in the distant past when people survived the rigors of nature \u2013 unpredictable weather, finding food, defending against violence \u2013 because of safety in numbers. Standing alone against the world was nigh impossible in our ancient past. Surely affiliation with a group of people increased the likelihood of survival. While seemingly obvious, this idea remained hidden in the shadow cast by the light of Darwin\u2019s evolutionary theory for almost a hundred years. Why would I cooperate when I need to be selfish to survive?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">That cooperation is important for survival is supported by evolutionary biologists who have demonstrated this idea mathematically. Pioneering work in 1964 by Hamilton provided key insights as to why individuals\u2019 ideas of survival of the fittest was not solely a selfish-impulse.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[1]<\/span><\/a> Specifically, his work found that organisms do not reproduce, genes do. Genes that are shaped by a need to survive can do so in two ways: 1) an organism can reproduce itself by passing its genes to its offspring; or 2) it can help other organisms that share its genes, such as its relatives. Subsequent researchers over the decades continue to affirm these findings, as well as that cooperation is key to survival.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">A modern investing education usually includes a short detour into game theory. Typically, what people remember after this diversion is the Prisoners\u2019 Dilemma. Here, co-conspiring criminals facing prosecution \u201cwin\u201d by selling out their partner in crime and labeling them as the primary instigator. Yet, as I have written elsewhere this strategy only holds in a very limited set of circumstances and that <a href=\"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web2012\/07\/16\/capitalism-its-as-much-about-cooperation-as-competition\/\">cooperation is almost always a better strategy<\/a>. Other game theorists have researched and found the same thing. For example, Nowak and Sigmund found that, \u201cCooperation pays because it confers the image of a valuable community member to the cooperating individual.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[2]<\/span><\/a> Their work with computer simulations finds, \u201cthe emergence of indirect reciprocity was a decisive step for the evolution of human species.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[3]<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">In summary, the survival of the species depends, in part, on how well groups perform vs. nature. Group performance, in turn, depends on how well the members of the group work together and how they fit together.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Finally, that belonging to a group is important to people is also made obvious when you consider the way that we punish people for violating the laws or norms of a group. In short, we punish people by pushing them further away from the group. A violation of family norms can result in being \u201csent to our room,\u201d or if the violation is worse, in \u201cgrounding.\u201d Here the misbehaving child is cleaved off from the group temporarily.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Within society people who violate the law severely enough are carved out from society and sent to prison. Violations within prison can lead to solitary confinement, which many consider a truly severe punishment. Some even label solitary confinement as inhumane which is strong evidence that group affiliation is important to people.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Proof that we are social creatures is that solitary confinement has profound effects on our biological and psychological health. Solitary confinement is associated with a 26% increased risk of premature death stemming from our stress response which dumps cortisol into our system and increases blood pressure and inflammation.<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[4]<\/span><\/a> It is also well-known that increased isolation increases our risk for suicide.<a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[5]<\/span><\/a> Long-term solitary confinement leads to very strange effects such as the inability to recognize faces, and to learn new things due to the damage it does to the hippocampus.<a href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[6]<\/span><\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Closer to home, and here I am talking about at investment firms, those that fail to thrive within the culture of their firms either leave or are eventually fired. Many investment organizations spend large amounts of time trying to identify the type of culture they want at their firms, and then they actively hire people in conformity with their culture. This is verified by a perusal of one of the investment industry\u2019s leading consultancies Focus Consulting Group\u2019s \u201cWritings\u201d section of its website.<a href=\"#_ftn7\" name=\"_ftnref7\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[7]<\/span><\/a> Their site features 5 whitepapers on culture, as well as 13 articles just on its main page. Additionally, the titles of these writings are telling, too:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">\u201cLinking Strong Culture to Success\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">\u201cManaging Culture: Leaders as Shapers of Reality\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">\u201cCulture as a Strategic Advantage\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">\u201cCommercial Success and Culture\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">\u201cGood Cultures Don\u2019t Scare People\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">In other words, groups functioning well sociologically are a key concern of investment organizations. We can also conclude then that to succeed in investment organizations partially requires that we are:<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Fluent with our group or organization\u2019s norms<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Behave in accordance with our group or organization\u2019s norms<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">As demonstrated in my other articles on behavioral biases, they arise when we fail to understand reality for what it is, and instead respond reflexively to situations. Group norms are the very definition of reflexive responses to reality.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">For example, how easy is it for a research analyst to pitch a waste management business to a portfolio manager if the firm has been hurt by the performance of waste management companies in the past? Or, how easy is it for a research analyst serving on a value product to stretch the valuation norms when pitching a stock? How easy is it for a member of an investment committee to ignore a group decision and purchase a stock on her own?<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">I am not arguing that we ignore the sociological expectations of our organizations to avoid behavioral bias. Instead, I am arguing that sociology and the anxiety of being rejected by the group is a powerful incentive to behave in very particular ways. I am using strong examples to indicate that sociology does bias decision sets by limiting our available decisions. Consequently, to fully understand behavioral bias, we need to consider the group setting.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">With regard to the classic behavioral biases themselves, some firms have established risk averse cultures where loss aversion is more likely to express itself. While still other cultures may prefer cocksure thinkers and have a \u201csurvival of the fittest\u201d environment where analysts fight for their ideas to end up in the portfolio. Here overconfidence is more likely to be present sociologically. And so on. In my work as a consultant working with organizations the very hallmarks of the investment culture are also frequently the sources of institutionalized behavioral bias.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><strong>Group Feedback Matters<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">Hopefully the discussion above strongly indicates that bias is likely to be reinforced, if not outright created by the social milieus in which we work. But there are even biological effects caused moment-to-moment by the feedback we receive \u2013 positive or negative \u2013 from our groups.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">In my previous articles in this series I described a model of the brain and how we use it to make decisions. Importantly, the final part of the decision-making loop is \u201cfeedback.\u201d That is, after we make a decision we observe the consequences of our choice. If the result of our decision is a favorable outcome then our brains release hormones that feel good to us. Whereas, if the outcome is poor then hormones that do not feel good are released. This feedback mechanism reinforces the development of our behaviors, habits, reactions, and so on.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\">But how does the brain treat feedback from the groups in which we partake? \u201c[T]he brain transforms socially constructed rewards into the same \u2018common currency\u2019 [i.e. hormonal neurotransmitters] as \u2018natural rewards.\u2019\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn8\" name=\"_ftnref8\"><span style=\"font-size: 8px;\">[8]<\/span><\/a> In other words, at the level of our brains there is no difference. Furthermore, these researchers found, \u201cIf positive expected value is somehow coded by activity in these \u2018reward regions,\u2019 then investigators should be able to predict participants\u2019 choice behavior based on activation of these regions. This idea was recently explored by Kuhnen and Knutson (2005) who hypothesized that an increase in gain anticipation would promote risky choices, whereas an increase in loss anticipation would instead promote riskless choices.\u201d This is direct evidence that our social interactions contribute to our behavioral biases.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> Hamilton, W.D. \u201cThe genetical evolution of social behaviour.\u201d <em>Journal of Theoretical Biology<\/em> (1964) 7, 1-16<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Nowak, Martin A. and Karl Sigmund. \u201cEvolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring.\u201d <em>Nature<\/em>. Vol. 393 (11 June 1998): 573-577<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> Ibid.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> Holt-Lunstad, Julianne, Timothy B. Smith, Mark Baker, Tyler Harris, and David Stephenson. \u201cLoneliness and social isolation as risk factors for mortality: a meta-analytic review.\u201d <em>Perspectives on Psychological Science<\/em> Vol. 2 (March 2015): 227-237<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> Calati, Raffaella, Chiara Ferrari, Marie Brittner, Osmano Oasi, Emile Oli\u00e9, Andr\u00e9 F. Carvalho, and Philippe Courtet. \u201cSuicidal thoughts and behaviors and social isolation: A narrative review of the literature.\u201d <em>Journal of Affective Disorders<\/em> Vol. 245 (15 February 2019): 653-657<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\">[6]<\/a> Joo-Kim, Eun, Blake Pellman, and Jeansok J. Kim. \u201cStress effects on the hippocampus: a critical review.\u201d <em>Learning &amp; Memory<\/em>. Vol. 22, 411-416<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref7\" name=\"_ftn7\">[7]<\/a> Writings. Focus Consulting Group. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.focuscgroup.com\/writings\/\">http:\/\/www.focuscgroup.com\/writings\/<\/a> Accessed 7 December 2020.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: futural;\"><a href=\"#_ftnref8\" name=\"_ftn8\">[8]<\/a> Winkielman, Piotr, Brian Knutson, Martin Paulus, and Jennifer L. Trujillo. \u201cAffective Influence on Judgments and Decisions: Moving Towards Core Mechanisms.\u201d Review of General Psychology (2007). Vol. 11, No. 2: 179-192<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over the last several weeks we have been exploring A Theory of Behavioral Finance. So, far I have provided a high-level overview of the theory, as well as a discussion of two of the parents of behavioral bias: biology and psychology. In this article I discuss the sociological factors that lead to our errors in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":8752,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[407,3],"tags":[408,244,289,23,22,417,418],"class_list":["post-8782","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-behavioral-bias-deep-dive","category-the-blog","tag-a-theory-of-behavioral-finance","tag-behavioral-bias","tag-behavioral-biases","tag-behavioral-economics","tag-behavioral-finance","tag-sociological-factors","tag-solitary-confinement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8782","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8782"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8782\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/8752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8782"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8782"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jasonapollovoss.com\/web\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8782"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}